Q: What are the key changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) being proposed?
                  a) Currently the law says (at section 11) that an officer  “shall” issue a visa if the applicant meets the requirements of the Act.  This is changed in the bill to say an officer  “may” issue a visa if the applicant meets the requirements of the Act. 
                                        b) Currently the law says (at section 25) that the Minister “shall” examine an  application for humanitarian and compassionate consideration (H&C).  This is changed in the bill to “may” examine  the application if the applicant is outside Canada.
                  c) The bill gives the power to the Minister to issue  instructions for the processing of applications from economic immigrants and  H&C applicants outside Canada. The instructions could establish categories  of applications to be processed, determine the order in which the applications  should be processed, fix a limit on the number to be processed, and provide  rules for repeat applications.
                  d) The bill empowers the government to retain, return or  otherwise dispose of applications that, following the instructions, are not  processed.  This only applies to  applications subject to instructions, ie. economic immigrants and H&C  applicants outside Canada.
                  
                  Q: Do these changes affect refugees and Family Class applicants?
                  The new power to issue instructions does not apply to applicants  in the Refugee or Family Classes (i.e. refugees recognized in Canada as well as  those resettled from abroad, and their dependants, and people sponsored by a  family member).  These applicants therefore  will not be directly affected by new rules about priorities for processing,  limits on numbers to be processed, etc.  CIC  will continue to process all applications in the Refugee and Family Classes to  final decision.
                  However, refugees and people seeking family reunification  could be affected by the other changes:
                  
                    - All classes, including refugees and  Family Class, are affected by the change from “shall” to “may” in section  11.  This change means that refugees and  Family Class applicants will no longer have the same legal right to permanent  residence if they meet the requirements of the law.
- Overseas humanitarian and compassionate  applications are often the only way for refugees and others to be reunited  with immediate family in Canada.  The  bill will eliminate the legal right to have an overseas H&C application  examined.
Q: Why do people need to seek family reunification  through an overseas H&C application? 
                  The following are two situations where the law does not  provide children with a right to family reunification and humanitarian and  compassionate applications are the only recourse:
                  
                    - Separated refugee children in Canada cannot  apply for family reunification with their parents and siblings who are outside  Canada.  The only way for these children  to be reunited with their parents and siblings is through H&C.
- The excluded family member rule (Regulation  117(9)(d)) keeps many children unfairly separated from their parents, and  separates spouses.  The only way for  affected families to overcome the exclusion is through H&C.  (See CCR release, Children  separated from their families by immigration rules, 7 April 2008,  http://www.ccrweb.ca/eng/media/pressreleases/7april08.htm)
Q: Will the changes affect people seeking family  reunification through H&C?
                  The government has suggested that they would continue to  examine all family related H&C applications.  However, the bill eliminates the legal right  to have an overseas H&C application examined.  If the bill is passed, this government or a  future government could issue instructions leading to family related H&C  applications not being examined.
                  It is also important to recognize that there are other  compelling situations not related to family reunification where an H&C  application is the only recourse.  They  might never be examined if this bill is passed.
                  Q: Why is the government eliminating the right to have an  overseas H&C application examined?
                  The government has suggested that there are large numbers of  applicants in the Economic Class who seek H&C because they do not meet the  points.  However, they have not made  public the actual numbers.  It would seem  surprising if many people are doing this as it would be quite expensive and  have little chance of success.
                  Q: Will the changes allow the backlog of immigration  applications to be eliminated?
                                        No.  The bill only affects applicants made after  February 27, 2008. The backlog is made up of applications from before that date  and they will not be subject to the new instructions.
                  Q: What will happen to applications that are not  processed?
                  The government has  suggested that where an application is not going to be processed, it will be  returned and the fee reimbursed.   However, the government is giving itself the power to retain, return or  “otherwise dispose of” applications not processed.  This means that they will not be legally  obliged to return the application and reimburse the fee – they could simply  discard the application.
                  Q: What will be in the instructions for processing  Economic Class applicants?
                  It is difficult to say,  since the government has chosen not to publish any draft instructions.  The Minister has suggested that they could  identify certain categories of worker for priority processing (she gave the  example of medical professionals).  (See  CBC, The House, 5 April 2008).  It also  seems likely that the government plans to set limits on the number of  applications to be processed: once the limit is reached, further applications  will not be processed in that year and can be simply returned.   
                  Q: Should we be concerned about the proposed amendments?
                  Yes, see 10 reasons why: http://www.ccrweb.ca/documents/c50tenreasons.htm.
                  Q: What can we do?
                  Organizations and individuals can join their voices to those  calling for the amendments to be separated out from the budget bill, C-50, and  instead debated in full as a distinct bill to amend the Immigration and  Refugee Protection Act.
                  11 April 2008 
                  
                  
                  Release on Bill C-50, Legislative amendments will hurt family reunification for children, 17 March 2008
                  10 reasons to be concerned about proposed amendments to Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) in Bill C-50, April 2008
                  Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Amendments to modernize the immigration system 
                  Text and status of Bill C-50